|
|
Commentary
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) were created
by Congress in 2003 as a lower-cost alternative to traditional
health insurance, and a means of reducing U.S. health care costs.
In a speech to the National Association of Health Underwriters
on January 31, 2007, Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah said, “By
focusing attention on the individual’s stake in health care
expenses, these plans promise to hold down health care inflation.”
On the surface, this sounds promising. However, U.S. health care
costs continue to spiral out of control.
To understand why HSAs miss an opportunity
to rein in health care costs, let’s first examine how they
work. HSAs have two components:
- a tax-exempt savings account for medical
expenses; and
- a qualified high-deductible health
insurance plan (HDHP).
The savings account concept is fairly straight-forward
and similar to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), except
that withdrawals from an HSA may only be used to pay for qualified
medical expenses. Contributions to the savings account are tax-deductible
within limits that are adjusted annually for inflation. In 2007,
an individual can contribute $2,850 for self-coverage, or $5,650
for a family plan. Dental and vision care are qualified expenses,
but cosmetic procedures are not. HSA funds may not be used to
pay for health insurance premiums, except in extreme circumstances,
such as following job loss.
HDHP premiums generally cost much less than
traditional health insurance, because the policyholder pays for
all medical care up to a set deductible, which starts at $1,100
for individual policies and $2,200 for family coverage. Generally,
the higher the deductible, the lower the premium will be. Out-of-pocket
costs are limited to $5,500 for individual plans and $11,000 for
family plans, and may be paid from the HSA.
In theory, consumer directed health plans
like HSAs give patients incentive to shop for the best combination
of care and value, since they are paying the costs directly out
of their own savings accounts. In reality, once the deductible
is met, the insurance company covers the balance of the costs.
Therefore, consumers are not concerned whether a surgery costs
$20,000 or $120,000.
Of importance to the medical tourism
industry, HSAs offer patients no incentive to take advantage of
the substantial savings offered by overseas surgery.
Quality medical care is available
overseas at up to 80% less total cost than U.S. prices. Congress
has missed an opportunity to reduce soaring health care costs
through the HSA program by not including incentives for consumers
to pursue low cost options for the most costly procedures.
|
|